![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
"Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com> writes: > Even though > softirq is invoked at the end of dev_queue_xmit() via local_bh_enable(), > not all execution of softirq will result a __wake_up(). With higher > HZ rate, timer interrupt is more frequent and thus more softirq > invocation and leads to more __wake_up(), which then takes us to higher > throughput because cpu spend less time in idle. This sounds like a serious bug somewhere if true. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-06 10:34 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||