Messages in this thread | | | From | Blaisorblade <> | Subject | Re: PTRACE_SYSEMU numbering | Date | Thu, 6 Oct 2005 21:23:30 +0200 |
| |
On Friday 23 September 2005 17:10, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:46:38PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > The fix is easy, IMHO, and not even urgent. It suffices to move > > PTRACE_SYSEMU def from <linux/ptrace.h> to <asm-i386/ptrace.h>, and we > > didn't do that yet for laziness only. There's no architecture that I know > > of, apart i386, which implements SYSEMU (except maybe s390, but that > > isn't public).
> Please either renumber it to something above 0x4200,
> or make it i386 > private. I'm going to do this. > If you intend for other architectures to implement it in the > future, renumbering it would be better. Possibly yes, sooner or later ports will emerge, but this is already in production, so I have ABI issues.
For new archs, I'll use the right range. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |