[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [discuss] Re: SMP syncronization on AMD processors (broken?)
On Thursday 06 October 2005 15:50, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> Maybe we should reflect this in Kconfig ?
> config NR_CPUS
> range 2 128
> Or use a plain int for spinlock, instead of a signed char.

Hmm? 2.6 already uses int as far as I can see.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-06 16:04    [W:0.121 / U:1.500 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site