![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Pavel Machek wrote: > "Cool, so you have done 100% of work and now it is stable, fast and > tested. You only need to do 200% more work to get it merged". > > Merging into kernel is not easy, sorry. Of course. I was just saying that it might be better for users if you, Nigel and the other parties involved collaborated on getting suspend2 merged instead of working on 2 or 3 separate implementations. My gut feeling is that it would be quicker to do that than to nail the sucky low-level bugs that are bound to come up when developing the new uswsusp framework. And now, since there's nothing I can actually do to help this - you can't learn to be a kernel hacker in two weeks - I'll shut up. But I just wanted to remind everyone involved that from a user's perspective, it would be great if suspend2 were merged. It works, it's fast, it's stable, and it does what users want. That's a strong combination. It would be really good if you could work together to merge it. Cheers, Lorenzo -- http://www.colitti.com/lorenzo/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-05 23:21 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||