[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: what's next for the linux kernel?
    On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 07:48:12AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
    > What is incredibly idiotic is a file system that allws you to delete
    > files that you have no write access to. That is stupid beyond belief and
    > only the Unix community doesn't get it.

    If I have a directory and I want to remove it, I can almost always do
    that. The file only goes away if there are no other hardlinks to it.
    If someone cares about the file, they should keep a hardlink to it in a
    directory THEY own.

    Directories within directories on the other hand can make things a pain
    since if you don't own the subdir, you can't remove its contents, so you
    can't remove it. You could however likely move the dir somewhere else
    to get it out of your way.

    My directory is MY file and I get to do whatever I want to it. Who
    knows how someone else managed to get a file into it in the first place.

    /tmp is of course different since it has the bit turned on that says
    only the file owner can delete it. If you want that enabled on all
    directories, go ahead. It is supported, although who knows what
    applications that might break. unix supports both ways of directory
    behaviour after all. It isn't one way or the other.

    Len Sorensen
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-10-05 16:58    [W:0.027 / U:15.256 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site