lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 04 Oct 2005 08:13:54 +0300
FromJari Ruusu <>
SubjectRe: util-linux and data encryption
Paulo da Silva wrote:
> I had a loop filesystem encrypted with twofish
> algorithm.
> 
> Today, trying to mount the file, 'mount' claimed
> I needed to enter a password of 20 chars or more!
> Since I used less chars to encrypt, I was not able
> to recover the information!!!
> I tried CFLAGS="-DLOOP_PASSWORD_MIN_LENGTH=8"
> without any success. This causes 'mount' to accept
> the password, but, somehow, the decryption failled
> because the fs type remained unrecognized!
> 
> BTW, I am using gentoo and I also tried USE=old-crypt.
> No way!
> 
> I needed to install the version 2.12i to recover
> my information.
> 
> Is this related with util-linux or has something
> to do with gentoo patches or something?

Seems like gentoo has merged loop-AES' util-linux patch which has always
used better defaults.

Mainline util-linux compatible mount options for /etc/fstab

    encryption=twofish256,phash=unhashed2

Mainline util-linux compatible losetup command options

    losetup -e twofish256 -H unhashed2 ......
kerneli.org compatible mount options for /etc/fstab

    encryption=twofish256,phash=rmd160

kerneli.org compatible losetup command options

    losetup -e twofish256 -H rmd160 ......
mount and losetup programs don't enforce 20 character minimum passphrase
length when using 'rmd160' or 'unhashed2' hash functions.

Both mainline util-linux and kerneli.org compatible setups are broken
securitywise. If there still are file systems using such broken setups, now
is good time to re-encrypt them using stronger crypto.

-- 
Jari Ruusu  1024R/3A220F51 5B 4B F9 BB D3 3F 52 E9  DB 1D EB E3 24 0E A9 DD
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-04 03:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2008