![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 10/4/05, Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 18:59 +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU > > > ... > > > > +#endif > > > > > > Ewwwwww :) No real need to put new function in a big #ifdef like that. > > > Can you just create a new file for NUMA emulation? > > > > Hehe, what is this, a beauty contest? =) I agree, but I guess the > > reason for this code to be here is that a similar arrangement is done > > by x86_64... > > If that's really the case, can they _actually_ share code? Maybe we can > do this NUMA emulation thing in non-arch code. Just guessing... I'd like to avoid duplication as much as you, but at a quick glance the x86_64 and i386 architecture looked pretty different. But I will see what I can do. > > I will create a new file. Is arch/i386/mm/numa_emu.c good? > > > But first, you have written lots and lots of patches, and I am > > confused. Could you please tell me on which patches I should base my > > code to make things as easy as possible? > > This is the staging ground for my memory hotplug work. But, it contains > all of my work on other stuff, too. If you build on top of this, it > would be great: > > http://sr71.net/patches/2.6.14/2.6.14-rc2-git8-mhp1/ I will build on top of that then. Thanks, / magnus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-04 03:09 [W:0.888 / U:0.040 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||