![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
"J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es> writes:
> Just for curiosity, could you both benchmark this also:
>
> int is_zero_ether_addr0(const unsigned char *addr)
> {
> return !(((unsigned long *)addr)[0] | ((unsigned short*)addr)[2]);
> }
It's probably slower when addr is unaligned, especially when unaligned
accesses need to be emulated.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-30 10:49 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||