Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:32:21 -0500 | From | Theodore Ts'o <> | Subject | Re: New (now current development process) |
| |
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 12:29:28AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > Please don't. Even the two weeks are too short IMHO, because it is > hard to digest so much code in such a short time and also it is not > always easy for maintainers to hit such short time windows for sending > patches. > > > I don't think anybody has been really unhappy with this approach? Hmm? > > The long freeze periods were nothing much happens are painful. It > would be better to have some more overlap of merging and stabilizing > (stable does that already kind of, but not enough)
I thought Andrew was accepting patches targeted at 2.6.n+1 into the -mm tree during the freeze periods, yes? If so, why would it be a case of "nothing much happens"? Nothing much might be happening in Linus's git tree, but that doesn't that they can't be happening in Andrew's -mm patchsets....
- Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |