![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
> Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>> Ahmad Reza Cheraghi wrote:
>>
>>> Can somebody tell me why the Kernel-Development dont
>>> wanne have XML is being used in the Kernel??
>>>
>>
>> Because nobody has come up with a good reason why it
>> should be. Same as anything that isn't in the kernel.
>>
>> Nick
>>
> I have a requirement to pass information from the kernel to user space.
> The information is passed fairly rarely, but over time extra parameters
> are added. At the moment we just use a struct, but that means that the
> kernel and the userspace app have to both keep in step. If something
> like XML was used, we could implement new parameters in the kernel, and
> the user space could just ignore them, until the user space is upgraded.
> XML would initially seem a good idea for this, but are there any methods
> currently used in the kernel that could handle these parameter changes
> over time.
>
> For example, should the sysfs be used for this?
>
> Any comments?
For decades people have been solving this with key:value, ignoring
unknown keys. And using nice text format eliminates any endian and word
size issues.
XML sounds like overkill for problems of this type.
--
-bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-03 19:23 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||