![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
jmerkey wrote: > Nick Piggin wrote: > >> Jeff V. Merkey wrote: >> >>> >>> Verified. These numbers reflect my measurements as well. I have not >>> moved off 2.6.9 to newer kernels on shipping products due to these >>> issues. There are also serious stability issues as well, though >>> 2.6.14 seems a little better than than previous kernels. Jeff >>> >> >> These issues aren't going to fix themselves. Did you investigate >> any of the performance or (more importantly) stability problems? > > Added a little more clarification. Jeff > Yes I did. The list wasn't too long. I had problems with RCU messages > and irq warn messages at very high loads and init respawning itself > subjected to loads > 369 MB/S to the disk channels on 2.6.13. > Performance was down on disk I/O [vs.] 2.6.9. I did not investigate > the BIO fixes but something changed there. Theres also some memory > problems with corruption somewhere in the 2.6.14 (during module unload > and shutdown). > > Jeff > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-29 02:37 [W:0.240 / U:0.050 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||