![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Friday 28 October 2005 09:52, Evgeny Stambulchik wrote: > You're right, when I mount the floppy with "-o sync", touch fails > immediately (I did try earlier sync(1), as somebody suggested, and it > didn't matter; yes, I know about the difference between sync(2) and > fsync(2)). On the other hand, umount is supposed to flush all the data > by the time it returns yet still it succeeded. Is that guaranteed? Or do you need to pass some weird flag to umount? (I know there's lazy unmounts, for example. I don't know what the guarantees are for standard unmounts...) Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-29 05:16 [W:0.220 / U:1.130 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||