![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Verified. These numbers reflect my measurements as well. I have not moved off 2.6.9 to newer kernels on shipping products due to these issues. There are also serious stability issues as well, though 2.6.14 seems a little better than than previous kernels. Jeff Jeff Garzik wrote: > Chen, Kenneth W wrote: > >> Kernel performance data for 2.6.14 (released yesterday) is updated at: >> http://kernel-perf.sourceforge.net >> >> As expected, results are within run variation compares to 2.6.14-rc5. >> No significant deviation found compare to 2.6.14-rc5 > > > Do I read this correctly: according to your benchmarks, fileio-noop > and fileio-cfq are down some 20% or more, across all machine > configurations, since 2.6.9? In the 4P configuration, dbench-{noop,as} > both seem to have regressed as well. > > Jeff > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-29 00:08 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||