![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread Patch in this message |
akpm@osdl.org wrote: > > - Why isn't set_cpus_allowed() just a no-op on UP? Or some trivial thing > which tests for cpu #0? It's still needed to weed out bogus masks that have CPU 0 turned off. You're right that it doesn't need to check cpu_online_map though. Here is a patch to make it check for CPU 0 instead. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ extern int set_cpus_allowed(task_t *p, c #else static inline int set_cpus_allowed(task_t *p, cpumask_t new_mask) { - if (!cpus_intersects(new_mask, cpu_online_map)) + if (!cpu_isset(0, new_mask)) return -EINVAL; return 0; } - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-28 02:52 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||