Messages in this thread | | | From | Blaisorblade <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/6] Uml - reuse i386 cpu-specific tuning | Date | Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:19:30 +0200 |
| |
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 09:22, Andrew Morton wrote: > "Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso" <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote: > > arch/i386/Kconfig | 304 > > ------------------------------------------------ arch/i386/Kconfig.cpu | > > 305 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Have mercy. I currently have twelve patches which alter arch/i386/Kconfig > and this patch conflicts with most of them. This shouldn't come as a > surprise - Kconfig files are oft-patched, and this is x86.
Yep - if we get no objection with this, I could pull any changes in -mm and merge the patch directly Linuswards at some point, since it has so many conflicts.
So, you can probably leave what you have there. > What I did was to simply copy the large block between
> if !X86_ELAN > > and > > config X86_OOSTORE > > over into Kconfig.cpu, taking the modifications with it.
I also took X86_TSC with me, in my patch.
> As long as that's also what you did things should work OK. If you actually > made any changes as you did the copy-and-paste, we're screwed.
No, I didn't do real changes - I just added a couple of comments. However yes, should have splitout in copy+paste and changes
+# Put here option for CPU selection and depending optimization [...] and the comment near "endif" to say what is it closing: +#!X86_ELAN
-- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |