![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote: > > Takahashi-san wrote: > > I realized CPUSETS has another problem around pdflush. > > Excellent observation. I had not realized this. > > Thank-you for pointing it out. > > I don't have plans. Do you have any suggestions? Per-zone dirty thresholds (quite messy), per-zone writeback (horrific, linear searches or data structure proliferation everywhere). Let's see a (serious) worload/testcase first, hey? vmscan.c writeback off the LRU is a bit slow, but we should be able to make it suffice. > ( Anyone know what the "pd" stands for in pdflush ?? ) "page dirty"? It's what bdflush became when writeback went from being block-based to being page-based. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-24 04:46 [W:0.140 / U:0.180 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||