lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Billionton bluetooth CF card: performance is 10KB/sec
Hi!

> > Ping time is around 50msec, and that seems pretty much okay, but
> > 10KB/sec seems like way too low.
> >
> > I am limited to 10KB/sec both on linux-to-linux bnetp transfers and it
> > limits my transfer rates using edge and n6230, too :-(.
>
> so you say that the Nokia 6230 has PAN Profile support and you don't
> need any PPP crap to get Internet access? This would be the first phone
> I have seen so far.

No, sorry, that was over ppp over rfcomm. With MSI dongle, I get
25KB/sec with n6230. With bluetooth CF card, I only get 10KB/sec.

> > 64 bytes from 10.1.0.3: icmp_seq=181 ttl=64 time=11789.1 ms
> > 64 bytes from 10.1.0.3: icmp_seq=182 ttl=64 time=10784.9 ms
> > 64 bytes from 10.1.0.3: icmp_seq=183 ttl=64 time=9781.1 ms
>
> The initial pings look good, the rest is very bad.

Rest is during transfer. I'd expect it to be slightly worse, but not
that bad.

> > Netdev watchdog complains a lot:
> >
> > Oct 22 18:53:57 amd pand[2439]: Bluetooth PAN daemon version 2.19
> > Oct 22 18:53:57 amd pand[2439]: Connecting to <won't tell you>
> > Oct 22 18:53:58 amd pand[2439]: bnep0 connected
> > Oct 22 18:54:37 amd kernel: usb 3-1: USB disconnect, address 2
> > Oct 22 18:55:33 amd kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: bnep0: transmit timed out
> > Oct 22 18:55:59 amd last message repeated 2 times
> > Oct 22 18:56:51 amd last message repeated 5 times
> > Oct 22 18:57:55 amd last message repeated 3 times
> > Oct 22 18:59:03 amd last message repeated 7 times
>
> The transmit timeouts shouldn't be there. The question is now which side
> is at fault. The host or the phone?

This is against second linux box... Can't be the phone.

> Please do a "hcitool info <won't tell you>" as root so I can see which
> what chip we are dealing. Also "hciconfig hci0 version" for your card
> would help.

On billionton card:

root@spitz:/bt# hcitool info <address of MSI card>
Requesting information ...
BD Address: <address of MSI card>
Device Name: BlueZ (0)
LMP Version: 1.1 (0x1) LMP Subversion: 0x20d
Manufacturer: Cambridge Silicon Radio (10)
Features: 0xff 0xff 0x0f 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
<3-slot packets> <5-slot packets> <encryption> <slot offset>
<timing accuracy> <role switch> <hold mode> <sniff mode>
<park state> <RSSI> <channel quality> <SCO link> <HV2 packets>
<HV3 packets> <u-law log> <A-law log> <CVSD> <paging scheme>
<power control> <transparent SCO>
root@spitz:/bt# hciconfig hci0 version
hci0: Type: UART
BD Address: <address of billionton> ACL MTU: 192:8 SCO MTU: 64:8
HCI Ver: 1.1 (0x1) HCI Rev: 0x33c LMP Ver: 1.1 (0x1) LMP Subver: 0x33c
Manufacturer: Cambridge Silicon Radio (10)
root@spitz:/bt#

On MSI side:

root@bug:~# hcitool info <address of billionton>
Requesting information ...
BD Address: <address of billionton>
Device Name: billionton
LMP Version: 1.1 (0x1) LMP Subversion: 0x33c
Manufacturer: Cambridge Silicon Radio (10)
Features: 0xff 0xff 0x0f 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
<3-slot packets> <5-slot packets> <encryption> <slot offset>
<timing accuracy> <role switch> <hold mode> <sniff mode>
<park state> <RSSI> <channel quality> <SCO link> <HV2 packets>
<HV3 packets> <u-law log> <A-law log> <CVSD> <paging scheme>
<power control> <transparent SCO>
root@bug:~#

> You can also use "hcidump -X -V" to analyze the traffic.

Do you prefer hcidump on MSI or on billionton side? On MSI side it is
easy to get, but it is generating *big* logs.
Pavel
--
Thanks, Sharp!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-23 11:50    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site