![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > > > > I just switched cycle_t to u64 and hackbench no longer makes the time go > > > backwards. > > > > > > John, would this cause any problems to keep cycle_t at s64? > > > > I mean at u64. > > ugh. There's both cycles_t and cycle_t. We should unify the two and it > should be 64-bit. The faster systems get, the sooner the 32-bit counter > overflows. 64-bit systems are keeping 32-bit compatibility for quite > some time to come. So with an 8GHz CPU the 32-bit cycle_t would wrap in > like 500 msecs, way too fast to rely on ... (even with a 4GHz CPUs it's > only one second.) > > i've made cycle_t u64 and have uploaded -rt14. > Ingo, I'm disappointed in you, I expected you to upload 2.6.14-rc5-rt1 ;-) -- Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-20 16:12 [W:1.783 / U:0.160 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||