[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] i386 spinlocks should use the full 32 bits, not only 8 bits

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> the unlock is simple even in the preemption case

No it's not. It needs to decrement the preemption counter and test it.

See kernel/spinlock.c:

void __lockfunc _spin_unlock(spinlock_t *lock)

and look at what "preempt_enable()" does.

In other words, with CONFIG_PREEMPT, your patch is WRONG. You made
"spin_unlock()" just skip the preempt_enable.

In fact, with preemption, the _locking_ is the simpler part. Unlock is the
complex one.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.029 / U:3.976 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site