[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/sunrpc/: possible cleanups
    On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 08:40:19PM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
    > On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 04:20:41PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
    > > -/* Just increments the mechanism's reference count and returns its input: */
    > > -struct gss_api_mech * gss_mech_get(struct gss_api_mech *);
    > > -
    > > -struct gss_api_mech *
    > > +static struct gss_api_mech *
    > > gss_mech_get(struct gss_api_mech *gm)
    > Comment is lost.

    The comment made sense for the prototype at the header, but the function
    now has only one caller in the file where it's defined.

    If someone needs a comment to figure out what a function whose complete
    contents is

    static struct gss_api_mech *
    gss_mech_get(struct gss_api_mech *gm)
    return gm;

    does, the problem is not a missing comment.



    "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
    of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
    "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
    Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-10-02 16:43    [W:0.020 / U:16.556 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site