[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Why no XML in the Kernel?
James Courtier-Dutton wrote:

> I have a requirement to pass information from the kernel to user space.
> The information is passed fairly rarely, but over time extra parameters
> are added. At the moment we just use a struct, but that means that the
> kernel and the userspace app have to both keep in step. If something
> like XML was used, we could implement new parameters in the kernel, and
> the user space could just ignore them, until the user space is upgraded.
> XML would initially seem a good idea for this, but are there any methods
> currently used in the kernel that could handle these parameter changes
> over time.
> For example, should the sysfs be used for this?
> Any comments?

Yes use sysfs (or procfs if the information is related to a process).
Using ASCII text representation, and a single value per file is
noramlly the preferred method to do this I think.


SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-02 12:38    [W:0.086 / U:3.456 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site