![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 17:04:51 -0700 Martin J. Bligh wrote: > --Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> wrote (on Monday, October 03, 2005 00:05:45 +0100): > > > On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 05:05:42PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > >> On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > >> > >> > and, what is the linux kernel? > >> > > >> > it's a daft, monolithic design that is suitable and faster on > >> > single-processor systems, and that design is going to look _really_ > >> > outdated, really soon. > >> > >> Linux already has a number of scalable SMP synchronisation > >> mechanisms. > > > > ... and you are tied in to the decisions made by the linux kernel > > developers. > > Yes. As are the rest of us. So if you want to implement something > different, that's your perogative. So feel free to go do it > somewhere else, and quit whining on this list. > > We are not your implementation bitches. If you think it's such a great > idea, do it yourself. IOW, -ENOPATCH. where's your patch? --- ~Randy You can't do anything without having to do something else first. -- Belefant's Law - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-03 00:17 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||