![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote: > On 10/15/05, li nux <lnxluv@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>Sorry, couldn't get what you want to say. >>Can you please elaborate. > > > http://www.zipworld.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/top-posting.txt > http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html The whole post fit on one screen and he was not continuing the conversation, he was commenting on your post as a whole. I think you're being a bit pedantic here. I don't think his reply failed your criteria, it wasn't overlong, it didn't break a flowing discussion, and no backward reading was required. ~~~~~~~ Q: Why is top-posting evil? A1: Because top-posters tend to leave the entirety of the email to which they are replying intact, so the email gets too long. A2: Because we prefer to use bottom-posting, and it is *extremely* hard to maintain a coherently flowing email conversation when some of the participants are bottom-posting and some are top-posting. A3: backwards read don't humans because -- -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com) "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the last possible moment - but no longer" -me - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-19 21:30 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||