lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc2-kt5

    * Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:

    > > and no, ktimers are not "optimized for process usage" (or tied to
    > > whatever other process notion, as i said before), they are optimized
    > > for:
    > >
    > > - the delivery of time related events
    > >
    > > as contrasted to the timeout-API (a'ka "timer wheel") code in
    > > kernel/timers.c that is optimized towards:
    > >
    > > - the fast adding/removal of timers
    > >
    > > without too much focus on robust and deterministic delivery of events.
    >
    > You forgot the main property of high resolution, which implies a
    > higher maintainance cost.

    what did i forget? I did not mention "high resolution" anywhere. And
    what precisely do you mean by "higher maintainance cost"?

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-10-19 08:53    [W:0.088 / U:0.228 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site