lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc2-kt5

* Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:

> > and no, ktimers are not "optimized for process usage" (or tied to
> > whatever other process notion, as i said before), they are optimized
> > for:
> >
> > - the delivery of time related events
> >
> > as contrasted to the timeout-API (a'ka "timer wheel") code in
> > kernel/timers.c that is optimized towards:
> >
> > - the fast adding/removal of timers
> >
> > without too much focus on robust and deterministic delivery of events.
>
> You forgot the main property of high resolution, which implies a
> higher maintainance cost.

what did i forget? I did not mention "high resolution" anywhere. And
what precisely do you mean by "higher maintainance cost"?

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-19 08:53    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site