![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 02:10:09PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Dipankar Sarma a écrit : > >On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:10:04AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> >Agreed. It is not designed to work that way, so there must be > >a bug somewhere and I am trying to track it down. It could very well > >be that at maxbatch=10 we are just queueing at a rate far too high > >compared to processing.> > > > I can freeze my test machine with a program that 'only' use dentries, no > files. > > No message, no panic, but machine becomes totally unresponsive after few > seconds. > > Just greping for call_rcu in kernel sources gave me another call_rcu() use > from syscalls. And yes 2.6.13 has the same problem. Can you try it with rcupdate.maxbatch set to 10000 in boot command line ? FWIW, the open/close test problem goes away if I set maxbatch to 10000. I had introduced this limit some time ago to curtail the effect long running softirq handlers have on scheduling latencies, which now conflicts with OOM avoidance requirements. Thanks Dipankar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-17 12:45 [W:1.710 / U:0.330 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||