[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc2-kt5

* Roman Zippel <> wrote:

> > the moment you express yourself via patches we'll know that 1) you
> > understand what we have done so far 2) you have useful ideas of what
> > should be done differently 3) you have the coder capability to implement
> > and test those ideas. Patches wont be ignored, i can assure you. Get the
> > patches rolling!
> This "shut up and show code" attitude is sometimes quite funny, but
> it's no real threat to me. I hoped to avoid this and solve this more
> civilized. Of course I'll understand the issues better afterwards, but
> you could as easily just tell me. [...]

if a dozen mails werent enough then one more probably wont make a
difference, especially with your last mail calling Thomas's behavior
"childish" - when all he did was to try to explain his reasons to you as
patiently as possible! Thomas is not obliged to teach you or bear with
you - it is his own free choice. (But if you want to discuss this
personal angle any further please take the public lists (and other
people) off the Cc: list, it's getting very off-topic.)

Thomas's stuff is now fully integrated into the -rt tree and it works
excellently. I have measured a 12 usecs worst-case HR timer-delivery
latency (using cyclictest). _That_ is the thing i care about.

> [...] It will waste my time, I could spend on other projects and it
> will put Andrew in the unfortunate position to decide, which patch to
> accept. [...]

yes, please, put Andrew (and me too) into that unfortunate position!
Please, pretty please, get on with the patches!

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-17 11:44    [W:0.137 / U:3.032 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site