Messages in this thread | | | Date | 17 Oct 2005 18:41:13 -0400 | From | linux@horizon ... | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc2-kt5 |
| |
>> I have to disagree. Once you grasp the desirability of having two kinds >> of timers, one optimized for the case where it does expire, and one >> optimized for the case where it is aborted or rescheduled before its >> expiration time, the timer/timeout terminology seems quite intuitive >> to me.
> Thank you, that's exactly the confusion, I'd like to avoid.
Er... *what* confusion? I wasn't in the slightest bit confused when I wrote that, and re-reading it very carefully, I can't see how it could be interpreted in a way that is in any way confusing.
There's no more confusion in that paragraph than there is lemon meringue.
The only thing confusing is your response. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |