![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Monday 17 October 2005 21:04, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So the only thing that worried me (and made me ask whether there might be > machines where it doesn't work) is if some machines might have their high > memory (or no memory at all) on NODE(0). It does sound unlikely, but I > simple don't know what kind of strange NUMA configs there are out there. It could happen in VirtualIron (they seem to interleave node 0 over many nodes to get equal use of lowmem in 32bit NUMA), but should not in x86-64.. > And I'm definitely only interested in machines that are out there, not > some theoretical issues. According to Alex W. it will break their sx1000 IA64 boxen. -Andi (who still thinks it's best to just ignore it or disable Intel NUMA) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-17 19:12 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||