![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 11:20 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote: > > > Maybe someone with access to ia64 NUMA boxen can check if the NODE(0) > > solution works (and does not break anything) on ia64? Chrisoph, can you help? > > Umm... SGI does not use the swiotlb and we do not have these issues. HP > does use the swiotlb on IA64. CCing John and Alex. ... > @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ > /* > * Get IO TLB memory from the low pages > */ > - io_tlb_start = alloc_bootmem_low_pages(io_tlb_nslabs * > + io_tlb_start = alloc_bootmem_node(NODE_DATA(0), io_tlb_nslabs * HP ia64 boxes typically use a hardware I/O TLB, so this is not the normal case. However, the sx1000 boxes are exactly an example that will break because of this assumption about memory layout. These boxes can be configured to have various ratios of node local memory and interleaved memory. Node local memory starts well above 4GB. Interleaved memory is zero-based, and described in it's own proximity domain. It therefore looks like a memory-only node. I believe the above code change would cause us to allocate memory from the node local range, way too high in the address space for bounce buffers. BTW, I've got a patch in Tony's testing branch that allows a late initialization of the swiotlb. This is currently only useful on ia64 since we have 4GB of ZONE_DMA, but may be useful on x86-ish archs when the 4GB zone is introduced. Alex -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-17 21:06 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||