![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Linus Torvalds a écrit : > So I suspect that the _real_ fix is: > > - for 2.6.14: remove the batching limig (or just make it much higher for > now) I would just remove it. If the limit is wrong, we crash again. And the realtime guys already are pissed off by batch=10000 anyway. > > - post-14: work on making sure rcu callbacks are done in a more timely > manner when the rcu queue gets long. This would involve TIF_RCUPENDING > and whatever else to make sure that we have timely quiescent periods, > and we do the RCU callback tasklet more often if the queue is long. > Absolutely. Keeping a count of (percpu) queued items is basically free if kept in the cache line used by list head, so the 'queue length on this cpu' is a cheap metric. A 'realtime refinement' would be to use a different maxbatch limit depending on the caller's priority : Let a softirq thread have a lower batch count than a regular user thread. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-17 16:04 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||