![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 08:27:40AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > The patch is actually not quite correct - in theory node 0 could be too small > > to contain the full swiotlb bounce buffers. > > Is node 0 guaranteed to be all low-memory? What if it allocates stuff at > the end of memory on NODE(0)? > > Anyway, it sounds like "alloc_bootmem_low_pages()" is seriously buggered > if it allocates non-low pages, if only because of its name... > > > The real fix would be to get rid of the pgdata lists and just walk the > > node_online_map on bootmem.c. The memory hotplug guys have > > a patch pending for this. > > Argh. Which one should I pick? The NODE(0) one looks simpler, but is it > sufficient for now in practice (with the real one going into 2.6.14+)? That's the reason I made a small patch. It does work on the boxes we use. But I like Yasunori-san's patch. Mine is just a chewing gum fix. Thanks, Kiran - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-17 17:39 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||