lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] miss-sync changes on attributes (Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime))
FromOGAWA Hirofumi <>
DateWed, 12 Oct 2005 13:58:52 +0900
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:

> However there's not much point in writing a brand-new function when
> write_inode_now() almost does the right thing. We can share the
> implementation within fs-writeback.c.

Indeed. We use the generic_osync_inode() for it?

> Isn't write_inode_now() buggy? If !mapping_cap_writeback_dirty() we
> should still write the inode itself?

Indeed. It seems we should write the dirty inode to backing device's buffers.
sync_sb_inodes() too? If so, really buggy.. I'll check it.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-12 07:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2010