Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:41:03 -0700 | From | "Siddha, Suresh B" <> | Subject | [Patch 2/2] x86, x86_64: fix Intel cache detection code assumption about threads sharing |
| |
Andrew, Please apply.
thanks, suresh --
Fix the Intel cache detection code assumption that number of threads sharing the cache will either be equal to number of HT or core siblings.
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
diff -pNru linux-2.6.14-rc3/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c --- linux-2.6.14-rc3/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c 2005-09-30 14:17:35.000000000 -0700 +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c 2005-10-07 16:27:37.708580280 -0700 @@ -303,29 +303,45 @@ static struct _cpuid4_info *cpuid4_info[ #ifdef CONFIG_SMP static void __devinit cache_shared_cpu_map_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index) { - struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf; + struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf, *sibling_leaf; unsigned long num_threads_sharing; -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_HT - struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = cpu_data + cpu; -#endif + int index_msb, i; + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = cpu_data; this_leaf = CPUID4_INFO_IDX(cpu, index); num_threads_sharing = 1 + this_leaf->eax.split.num_threads_sharing; if (num_threads_sharing == 1) cpu_set(cpu, this_leaf->shared_cpu_map); -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_HT - else if (num_threads_sharing == smp_num_siblings) - this_leaf->shared_cpu_map = cpu_sibling_map[cpu]; - else if (num_threads_sharing == (c->x86_num_cores * smp_num_siblings)) - this_leaf->shared_cpu_map = cpu_core_map[cpu]; - else - printk(KERN_DEBUG "Number of CPUs sharing cache didn't match " - "any known set of CPUs\n"); -#endif + else { + index_msb = get_count_order(num_threads_sharing); + + for_each_online_cpu(i) { + if (c[i].apicid >> index_msb == + c[cpu].apicid >> index_msb) { + cpu_set(i, this_leaf->shared_cpu_map); + if (i != cpu && cpuid4_info[i]) { + sibling_leaf = CPUID4_INFO_IDX(i, index); + cpu_set(cpu, sibling_leaf->shared_cpu_map); + } + } + } + } +} +static void __devinit cache_remove_shared_cpu_map(unsigned int cpu, int index) +{ + struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf, *sibling_leaf; + int sibling; + + this_leaf = CPUID4_INFO_IDX(cpu, index); + for_each_cpu_mask(sibling, this_leaf->shared_cpu_map) { + sibling_leaf = CPUID4_INFO_IDX(sibling, index); + cpu_clear(cpu, sibling_leaf->shared_cpu_map); + } } #else static void __init cache_shared_cpu_map_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index) {} +static void __init cache_remove_shared_cpu_map(unsigned int cpu, int index) {} #endif static void free_cache_attributes(unsigned int cpu) @@ -584,8 +600,10 @@ static int __devexit cache_remove_dev(st unsigned int cpu = sys_dev->id; unsigned long i; - for (i = 0; i < num_cache_leaves; i++) + for (i = 0; i < num_cache_leaves; i++) { + cache_remove_shared_cpu_map(cpu, i); kobject_unregister(&(INDEX_KOBJECT_PTR(cpu,i)->kobj)); + } kobject_unregister(cache_kobject[cpu]); cpuid4_cache_sysfs_exit(cpu); return 0; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |