Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] miss-sync changes on attributes (Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime)) | From | OGAWA Hirofumi <> | Date | Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:21:12 +0900 |
| |
"Machida, Hiroyuki" <machida@sm.sony.co.jp> writes:
> OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: >> Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes: >> >>>However there's not much point in writing a brand-new function when >>>write_inode_now() almost does the right thing. We can share the >>>implementation within fs-writeback.c. >> Indeed. We use the generic_osync_inode() for it? > > Please let me confirm. > Using generic_osync_inode(inode, NULL, OSYNC_INODE) instaed of > sync_inode_wodata(inode) is peferable for changes on fs/open.c, > even it would write data. Is it correct?
No, I only thought the interface is good. I don't know why it writes data pages even if OSYNC_INODE only. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |