lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] miss-sync changes on attributes (Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime))
"Machida, Hiroyuki" <machida@sm.sony.co.jp> wrote:
>
>
>
> OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> > Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:
> >
> >
> >>However there's not much point in writing a brand-new function when
> >>write_inode_now() almost does the right thing. We can share the
> >>implementation within fs-writeback.c.
> >
> >
> > Indeed. We use the generic_osync_inode() for it?
>
> Please let me confirm.
> Using generic_osync_inode(inode, NULL, OSYNC_INODE) instaed of
> sync_inode_wodata(inode) is peferable for changes on fs/open.c,
> even it would write data. Is it correct?
>

I don't know. It depends on what you're actually trying to do, and I don't
recall anyone having described that!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-12 08:13    [W:0.090 / U:0.824 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site