[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] miss-sync changes on attributes (Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime))
"Machida, Hiroyuki" <> wrote:
> OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> > Andrew Morton <> writes:
> >
> >
> >>However there's not much point in writing a brand-new function when
> >>write_inode_now() almost does the right thing. We can share the
> >>implementation within fs-writeback.c.
> >
> >
> > Indeed. We use the generic_osync_inode() for it?
> Please let me confirm.
> Using generic_osync_inode(inode, NULL, OSYNC_INODE) instaed of
> sync_inode_wodata(inode) is peferable for changes on fs/open.c,
> even it would write data. Is it correct?

I don't know. It depends on what you're actually trying to do, and I don't
recall anyone having described that!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-12 08:13    [W:0.056 / U:40.936 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site