lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] miss-sync changes on attributes (Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime))
    "Machida, Hiroyuki" <machida@sm.sony.co.jp> wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    > OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
    > > Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:
    > >
    > >
    > >>However there's not much point in writing a brand-new function when
    > >>write_inode_now() almost does the right thing. We can share the
    > >>implementation within fs-writeback.c.
    > >
    > >
    > > Indeed. We use the generic_osync_inode() for it?
    >
    > Please let me confirm.
    > Using generic_osync_inode(inode, NULL, OSYNC_INODE) instaed of
    > sync_inode_wodata(inode) is peferable for changes on fs/open.c,
    > even it would write data. Is it correct?
    >

    I don't know. It depends on what you're actually trying to do, and I don't
    recall anyone having described that!
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-10-12 08:13    [W:0.024 / U:89.532 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site