![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes: > > >>However there's not much point in writing a brand-new function when >>write_inode_now() almost does the right thing. We can share the >>implementation within fs-writeback.c. > > > Indeed. We use the generic_osync_inode() for it? Please let me confirm. Using generic_osync_inode(inode, NULL, OSYNC_INODE) instaed of sync_inode_wodata(inode) is peferable for changes on fs/open.c, even it would write data. Is it correct? -- Hiroyuki Machida machida@sm.sony.co.jp - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-12 03:59 [W:3.191 / U:0.520 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||