Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:54:47 +0900 | | From | "Machida, Hiroyuki" <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] miss-sync changes on attributes (Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime)) |
| |
OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes: > > >>However there's not much point in writing a brand-new function when >>write_inode_now() almost does the right thing. We can share the >>implementation within fs-writeback.c. > > > Indeed. We use the generic_osync_inode() for it?
Please let me confirm. Using generic_osync_inode(inode, NULL, OSYNC_INODE) instaed of sync_inode_wodata(inode) is peferable for changes on fs/open.c, even it would write data. Is it correct?
-- Hiroyuki Machida machida@sm.sony.co.jp
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |