lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 12 Oct 2005 14:54:47 +0900
From"Machida, Hiroyuki" <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] miss-sync changes on attributes (Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime))

OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:
> 
> 
>>However there's not much point in writing a brand-new function when
>>write_inode_now() almost does the right thing.  We can share the
>>implementation within fs-writeback.c.
> 
> 
> Indeed. We use the generic_osync_inode() for it?

Please let me confirm.
Using generic_osync_inode(inode, NULL, OSYNC_INODE) instaed of
sync_inode_wodata(inode) is peferable for changes on fs/open.c,
even it would write data. Is it correct?


-- 
Hiroyuki Machida		machida@sm.sony.co.jp		

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-12 03:59    [W:3.191 / U:0.520 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans