![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 08:26:46PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Sébastien Bernard <seb@frankengul.org> > Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 20:28:31 +0200 > > > Can one explain me why this patch works on other archs, and oops on the > > sparc64 smp ? > > Can one explain why I'm the only one to have this problem ? > > On your Ultra60 the two physical cpus are numbered "0" and "2". > Thanks for the information. Indeed they are. Does the patch assume that cpus are numbered in a row ? Now, I reverted the patch for ip_tables.c, ip6_tables.c and ebtables.c. Everything is working ok (11h uptime). Is this problem specific to the Ultra 60 or sparc arch ? Will a proper fix be issued for our machines ? Seb - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-10-10 06:27 [W:0.186 / U:0.220 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||