![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 13:25 +0100, DervishD wrote: > Hi All :) > > * Tomasz Torcz <zdzichu@irc.pl> dixit: > > Mainstream distributions use ,,sanitized'' version o kernel > > headers - Fedora has own set, Debian has another, LFS too. For rest > > and for us, casual users, there are headers made as byproduct of > > PLD Linux, which are used since december 2003 (before kernel 2.6 > > was even released). > > But the set of sanitized kernel headers, if you build your own > software and you're not using a distro, is only available for 2.6.x > kernels, not for 2.4.x kernels. The headers RH ships work for both... > > What should be done for 2.4 kernels? > I currently use a set of headers from the 2.4 kernel I used to build > my libc, not the headers from the current kernel I'm running, but I > would like to know anyway. .... and you can use 2.6 headers to build a glibc that works excellent for 2.4 kernels too. The kernel API/ABI *does not change on this level* between kernel versions. Things may get added, but they do not change. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:09 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||