[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: page migration patchset
Andi Kleen wrote:
>> You need lazy hugetlbfs to use it (= allocate at page fault time,
>> not mmap time). Otherwise the policy can never be applied. I implemented
>> my own version of lazy allocation for SLES9, but when I wanted to
>> merge it into mainline some other people told they had a much better
>> singing&dancing lazy hugetlb patch. So I waited for them, but they
>> never went forward with their stuff and their code seems to be dead
>> now. So this is still a dangling end :/
>> If nothing happens soon regarding the "other" hugetlb code I will
>> forward port my SLES9 code. It already has NUMA policy support.
>> For now you can remove the hugetlb policy code from mainline if you
>> want, it would be easy to readd it when lazy hugetlbfs is merged.

On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 03:43:39PM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> if you don't mind I'd like to. Sounds as if lazy hugetlbfs would be
> able to make use of the generic file mapping->policy instead of a
> hugetlb-specific policy anyway. Same goes for shmem.

If Andi's comments refer to my work, it already got permavetoed.

Anyway, using the vma's is a minor change. Please include this as a
patch separate from other changes (fault handling, consolidations, etc.)

-- wli
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.137 / U:0.716 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site