lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] macros to detect existance of unlocked_ioctl and ioctl_compat
    From
    Date
    On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 15:14 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 04:09:42PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > > I would agree that it shouldn't be used for in tree code, but for
    > > out of tree code it is rather useful. There are other such feature macros
    > > for major driver interface changes too (e.g. in the network stack).
    >
    > Which is the only place doing it. We had this discussion in the past
    > (lastone I revolve Greg vetoed it). We simply shouldn't clutter our
    > headers for the sake of out of tree drivers - with LINUX_VERSION_CODE
    > we've already implemented a mechanism for out of tree drivers.
    >
    > p.s. droppe alsa-devel from Cc because of the braindead moderation policy.
    >

    Um, alsa-devel is not moderated, we accept posts from non subscribers.
    Where do you think all the spam in our archive comes from?

    Lee

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.022 / U:3.532 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site