[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] macros to detect existance of unlocked_ioctl and ioctl_compat
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 15:14 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 04:09:42PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I would agree that it shouldn't be used for in tree code, but for
> > out of tree code it is rather useful. There are other such feature macros
> > for major driver interface changes too (e.g. in the network stack).
> Which is the only place doing it. We had this discussion in the past
> (lastone I revolve Greg vetoed it). We simply shouldn't clutter our
> headers for the sake of out of tree drivers - with LINUX_VERSION_CODE
> we've already implemented a mechanism for out of tree drivers.
> p.s. droppe alsa-devel from Cc because of the braindead moderation policy.

Um, alsa-devel is not moderated, we accept posts from non subscribers.
Where do you think all the spam in our archive comes from?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.063 / U:21.436 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site