[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] macros to detect existance of unlocked_ioctl and ioctl_compat
    On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 15:14 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 04:09:42PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > > I would agree that it shouldn't be used for in tree code, but for
    > > out of tree code it is rather useful. There are other such feature macros
    > > for major driver interface changes too (e.g. in the network stack).
    > Which is the only place doing it. We had this discussion in the past
    > (lastone I revolve Greg vetoed it). We simply shouldn't clutter our
    > headers for the sake of out of tree drivers - with LINUX_VERSION_CODE
    > we've already implemented a mechanism for out of tree drivers.
    > p.s. droppe alsa-devel from Cc because of the braindead moderation policy.

    Um, alsa-devel is not moderated, we accept posts from non subscribers.
    Where do you think all the spam in our archive comes from?


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.020 / U:71.036 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site