![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:44:06PM -0500, Jim Nelson wrote: > Brian Gerst wrote: > > >James Nelson wrote: > > > >>This series of patches is to remove the last cli()/sti() function > >>calls in arch/ppc. > >> > >>These are the only instances in active code that grep could find. > > > > > >Are you sure none of these need real spinlocks instead of just > >disabling interrupts? > > > >-- > > Brian Gerst > > > These are for single-processor systems, mostly evaluation boards and > embedded processors. I coudn't find any reference to multiprocessor > setups for the processors in question after a peruse of the code or a > quick google on the boards in question. think CONFIG_PREEMPT. In either case a spinlock becomes lock_irq_disable in the !SMP, !PREEMPT case but it documents the intention a whole lot better. Also you're locking only in a single plpace which is a ***BIG*** warning sign. At least look at the other users of the data structure, it's extremly likely they'll need locking aswell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||