Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:26:12 +0000 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.10-mm1 |
| |
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:04:08AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > or is it the addition of _smp_processor_id() as a way to signal 'this > smp_processor_id() call in a preemptible region is fine, trust me'?
Yes.
> We > could do smp_processor_id_preempt() or some other name - any better > suggestions?
I'd just kill the debug check and rely on the eye of the review to not let new users of smp_processor_id slip in.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |