![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:04:08AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > or is it the addition of _smp_processor_id() as a way to signal 'this > smp_processor_id() call in a preemptible region is fine, trust me'? Yes. > We > could do smp_processor_id_preempt() or some other name - any better > suggestions? I'd just kill the debug check and rely on the eye of the review to not let new users of smp_processor_id slip in. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||