lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 4 Jan 2005 09:26:12 +0000
FromChristoph Hellwig <>
SubjectRe: 2.6.10-mm1
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:04:08AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> or is it the addition of _smp_processor_id() as a way to signal 'this
> smp_processor_id() call in a preemptible region is fine, trust me'?

Yes.

> We
> could do smp_processor_id_preempt() or some other name - any better
> suggestions?

I'd just kill the debug check and rely on the eye of the review to not
let new users of smp_processor_id slip in.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2008