Messages in this thread | | | From | Tom Zanussi <> | Date | Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:03:51 -0600 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] relayfs redux, part 2 |
| |
Karim Yaghmour writes: > > Tom Zanussi wrote: > > OK, makes sense to me - I'll get rid of relay_reserve and replace it > > with the simple putc write and variant. > > Please don't do that. Instead, bring back the ad-hoc mode code, that's > what is was for anyway. >
I don't think they need to be mutually exclusive - we could keep relay_reserve(), but the relay_write() that's currently built on top of relay_reserve() would use the putc code instead. It's complicating the API a bit, but if it makes everyone happy...
Tom
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |