[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: starting with 2.7
    On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 02:24:12PM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
    > El Mon, 3 Jan 2005 06:33:04 +0100 Willy Tarreau <> escribió:
    > > I clearly don't agree with you, for a simple reason : those out-of-tree
    > > features will always be, because each distro likes to add a few features,
    > > like SquashFS, PaX, etc... And indeed, that's one of the reasons I *stay*
    > > on 2.4. It's so simple to simply upgrade the kernel, patch and recompile
    > > without spending days complaining "grrr... why did they change this ?".
    > 2.6 will stop having small issues in each release until 2.7 is forked just
    > like 2.4 broke things until 2.5 was forked. The difference IMO
    > is that linux development now avoids things like the unstability which the
    > 2.4.10 changes caused and things like the fs corruption bugs we saw in 2.4

    The 2.6.9 -> 2.6.10 patch is 28 MB, and while the changes that went into
    2.4 were limited since the most invasive patches were postponed for 2.5,
    now _all_ patches go into 2.6 .

    Yes, -mm gives a bit more testing coverage, but it doesn't seem to be
    enough for this vast amount of changes.



    "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
    of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
    "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
    Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.020 / U:0.392 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site