lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 3 Jan 2005 15:35:42 +0200
From"Michael S. Tsirkin" <>
SubjectRe: 2.6.10-mm1
Hello!
Quoting r. Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org) "Re: 2.6.10-mm1":
> > -ioctl-cleanup.patch
> > -unlocked_ioctl.patch
> > +ioctl-rework.patch
> > 
> >  New version of the dont-hold-BKL-across-ioctl patch.
> 
> For the native case the new naming is stupid.  The old ioctl_unlocked
> made perfect sense while ioctl_native doesn't - after all ->ioctl is
> native aswell.  Also this still has the useless inode * paramater in
> the method signature.

Regarding the inode* parameter, the change to remove it would be trivial,
though I personally dont care and I didnt see anyone else comment on that.
Anyone?


MST
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2008