[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: starting with 2.7
    On Llu, 2005-01-03 at 19:26, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
    > Agreed. We (whoever "we" are) have erred too much on longer
    > cycles for stability, but it's not working out as hoped IMO.

    After 2.6.9-ac its clear that the long 2.6.9 process worked very badly.
    While 2.6.10 is looking much better its long period meant the allegedly
    "official" base kernel was a complete pile of insecure donkey turd for
    months. That doesn't hurt most vendor users but it does hurt those
    trying to do stuff on the base kernels very badly.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.019 / U:11.772 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site