lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: starting with 2.7
    From
    Date
    On Llu, 2005-01-03 at 19:26, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
    > Agreed. We (whoever "we" are) have erred too much on longer
    > cycles for stability, but it's not working out as hoped IMO.

    After 2.6.9-ac its clear that the long 2.6.9 process worked very badly.
    While 2.6.10 is looking much better its long period meant the allegedly
    "official" base kernel was a complete pile of insecure donkey turd for
    months. That doesn't hurt most vendor users but it does hurt those
    trying to do stuff on the base kernels very badly.

    Alan

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.020 / U:119.588 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site