[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] get/set FAT filesystem attribute bits
    On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 13:35 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    > Nicholas Miell wrote:
    > > Instead of adding another ioctl, wouldn't an xattr be more appropriate?
    > > For instance, system.fatattrs containing a text representation of the
    > > attribute bits.
    > >
    > This really worries me, because it's not clear to me that Microsoft
    > isn't going to add NTFS-style xattrs to FAT in the future. There is a
    > very specific reason why they might want to do that: since they want to
    > keep NTFS secret and proprietary, FAT is the published interchange
    > format that other devices can use to exchange data with MS operating
    > systems. If we then have overloaded the xattr mechanism, that would be
    > very ugly.
    > -hpa

    That's why I put fatattrs in the system namespace, which is wholly owned
    by the Linux kernel. Any theoretical FAT-with-xattrs variant would put
    those xattrs in the user namespace.

    On another note, NTFS-style xattrs (aka named streams) are unrelated to
    Linux xattrs. A named stream is a separate file with a funny name, while
    a Linux xattr is a named extension to struct stat.
    Nicholas Miell <>

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.041 / U:2.808 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site