[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: starting with 2.7
    On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 01:36:21PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
    >> This is the model that we used with the
    >> 2.3.x series, where the time between releases was often quite short.
    >> That worked fairly well, but we stopped doing it when the introduction
    >> of BitKeeper eliminated the developer synch-up problem. But perhaps
    >> we've gone too far between 2.6.x releases, and should shorten the time
    >> in order to force more testing.

    On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 06:59:27PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
    > It is also the model we used until OLS this year - there was a 2.6
    > release about once a month prior to OLS. Post OLS, it's now once
    > every three months or there abouts, which, IMO is far too long.
    > I really liked the way pre-OLS 2.6 was working... it means I don't
    > have to twiddle my fingers getting completely bored waiting for the
    > next 2.6 release to happen. Can we return to that methodology please?


    -- wli
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.018 / U:20.452 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site