[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: multiple neighbour cache tables for AF_INET
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 07:46:05AM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
> In article <> (at Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:19:49 +1100), Herbert Xu <> says:
> > IMHO you need to give the user a way to specify which table they want
> > to operate on. If they don't specify one, then the current behaviour
> > of choosing the first table found is reasonble.
> We have dev. Isn't is sufficient?

It could be used for neigh_add/neigh_delete. We'll need to add a way
to query whether a given table is the right one for a device.

For dump it isn't the same. However, perhaps it's not too important
to query a specific table.

Visit Openswan at
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <>
Home Page:
PGP Key:
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.042 / U:0.992 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site