lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: multiple neighbour cache tables for AF_INET
    From
    On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 07:46:05AM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
    > In article <E1CueSz-0000lz-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> (at Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:19:49 +1100), Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> says:
    >
    > > IMHO you need to give the user a way to specify which table they want
    > > to operate on. If they don't specify one, then the current behaviour
    > > of choosing the first table found is reasonble.
    >
    > We have dev. Isn't is sufficient?

    It could be used for neigh_add/neigh_delete. We'll need to add a way
    to query whether a given table is the right one for a device.

    For dump it isn't the same. However, perhaps it's not too important
    to query a specific table.

    Cheers,
    --
    Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
    Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
    Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
    PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.047 / U:31.832 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site