lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: thoughts on kernel security issues


On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
> And, did that nice interface help at all? No, it did not.
> Noone made seqfile mandatory in 2.6.

Sure it helped. We didn't make it mandatory, but new stuff ends up being
written with it, and old stuff _does_ end up being converted to it.

> Now we have a few nice big patches to carry around because every driver
> author had its own proc implementation. Well done...

Details, please?

Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.134 / U:0.636 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site